R. Kelly The U.S. Supreme Courtroom requested that his convictions for possessing little one pornography and inducing intercourse from a minor be thrown out, arguing that the conduct he was accused of occurred many years in the past and due to this fact the fees had been outdoors the statute of limitations.
Right here’s the factor… When R. Kelly was charged in 2020 with possessing little one pornography and having intercourse with an underage woman again within the mid-to-late Nineties, he argued that the statute of limitations had run out.
Nonetheless, prosecutors argue {that a} 2003 legislation, often called the PROTECT Act, makes the statute of limitations for little one intercourse crimes indefinite.
Mainly, Kelly’s legal professionals Jennifer BonjeanIt argued that as a result of the conduct for which Kelly is at the moment serving time occurred within the Nineties however the PROTECT Act was not handed till 2003, the Act’s expanded statute of limitations didn’t apply to the fees in opposition to him.
The PROTECT Act indefinitely prolonged the statute of limitations for alleged crimes dedicated after the legislation got here into impact in 2003, however Congress particularly didn’t embrace a provision that will have allowed the legislation to use to alleged conduct dedicated earlier than 2003.
You could recall that Kelly was discovered responsible on six of 13 counts in 2020, three of which concerned little one pornography and three of which concerned solicitation.
August 2023
TMZ.com
He was sentenced to twenty years in jail and ordered to pay a whole bunch of 1000’s of {dollars} in restitution to his alleged victims.
The Supreme Courtroom will resolve within the coming months whether or not to listen to Kelly’s attraction.
