Gateway Pundit Unique
Authors: Jerome Corsi and Andrew Puckett
Dr. Jerome Corsi and Dr. Andrew Paquette on Wednesday with lawyer Thomas Connors of Mendenhall Regulation Group in Akron, Ohio Accompanied by the Ohio Secretary of State’s official investigative company to research Cosi’s scenario. The aim is to advertise mail-in poll fraud.
“This obvious prison scheme seems to be the work of covert rogue intelligence operatives who had been covertly embedded with the Ohio Election Fee to create practically imperceptible false voting data that may very well be licensed as legit mail-in ballots within the upcoming presidential election. , though their vote was unlawful,” Dr. Cosi stated.
In an hour-and-20-minute assembly (initially scheduled for a half-hour), Corsi and Paquette offered Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose’s workplace with a sequence of voter ID scatter plots by county. Corsi and Pacquette instructed Gateway Pundit that the scatterplots revealed simple proof {that a} mathematical formulation had been covertly utilized to create the encrypted project of Ohio Board of Elections voter ID numbers, a reality beforehand unknown to the Ohio Board of Elections.
When Brian Katz, director of the Ohio Division of Public Integrity, requested Josh Jaffe, an Ohio SOS technical knowledgeable, if he might clarify the obvious algorithm modifications within the chart Dr. Corsi confirmed, Mr. Jaffe Admittedly, he could not clarify what appeared to be occurring.
Corsi emphasised to The Gateway Pundit that Paquette found comparable secret algorithms in official state election board voter registration databases in a number of states.
Proven listed here are two scatter plots displaying how county voter ID numbers map to state voter ID numbers in another way for Marion County (close to Toledo) than for Lucas County, Ohio (which incorporates Toledo)
Determine 1 is a scatter plot mapping Fairfield County, Ohio voter ID numbers to Ohio voter ID numbers, which function official Ohio voter IDs as required by the Assist America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA) ID quantity for upkeep.
Determine 1
fairfield county ohio
County Voter ID Numbers Map to State Board of Elections Voter ID Numbers
Determine 1 clearly reveals that the Ohio Board of Elections legally maps county voter ID (CID, x-axis) numbers to State Board of Elections (SID) voter ID numbers (SID, y-axis). Voters register in a roughly straight line sample (anticipated to increase in a straight line sample from the origin of the chart to the higher proper nook of the chart, indicating that voters who registered in Fairfield County are inclined to obtain SIDs and CIDs that match their chronological order).
Fairfield County is a sparsely populated, rural county south of Licking, with a inhabitants of 158,921 on the 2020 census. Has a history of voting Republican. To any seasoned skilled observer of Ohio voting habits, the modification of the Fairfield County CID to accommodate fraudulent voter data utilized in a prison scheme to “elect” Democratic political shoppers for mail-in ballots is blatantly apparent. Suspect.
Determine 2 is a scatter plot mapping Lucas County, Ohio voter ID numbers to Ohio voter ID numbers as required by the Assist America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA) as official Ohio voter ID numbers. preserve.
Determine 2
Lucas County, Ohio
County Voter ID Numbers Map to State Board of Elections Voter ID Numbers
Lucas County, a principally city and densely populated county that features Youngstown and had a inhabitants of 431,279 on the 2020 census, voted for Democrat Sherrod Brown for the U.S. Senate (inaugurated in 2007 ), and voted for Democrat Tim Ryan for U.S. Senate in 2023. Lucas County has a big share of Democratic voters, so modifying the Mahanin County CID to accommodate fraudulent voter data to “elect” Democratic political shoppers could be apparent and affordable to any skilled Ohio voting practices skilled ( however extremely unlawful) technique.
Determine 2 clearly reveals that an algorithmic allocation (i.e., the appliance of a mathematical formulation) has been utilized inside the Ohio Board of Elections to map county voter ID (CID, x-axis) numbers to State Board of Elections (SID) voter ID numbers (SID, y axis) is against the law. That is visually apparent as a result of the sample of particular person voter IDs isn’t a straight sample from the decrease left to the higher proper of the chart. As an alternative, CIDs are mapped to a set of SID numbers which are unbiased of numbers assigned chronologically to match registration dates. There may be additionally no apparent logic to the allocation of SID clusters in a “fragmented” free mode, nor does it have something to do with the chronological allocation of matching registration dates.
The separation of State Election Fee voter registration ID numbers in Ohio’s encryption scheme matches the identical primary first step that Paquette present in algorithmic modifications to the New York State voter registration database, an obvious prison scheme designed to facilitate mail-in poll fraud .
For extra details about the algorithm added to the State Board of Elections’ official voter registration database, go to Corsi’s 501(c)3 web site: GodsFiveStones.com.
