Thailand plans to step up scrutiny of high-frequency buying and selling – efficient from Monday – following within the footsteps of China, the place program buying and selling will quickly come below real-time surveillance. Whereas authorities count on the measures will enhance transparency, the rising controls on sure transactions have raised issues that liquidity might tighten, making these markets much less enticing general.
Gary Dugan, chief govt of the Workplace of the International Chief Info Officer, stated: “The present development of regulators tightening the supervision of high-frequency buying and selling is considerably comprehensible, but in addition worrying.” “The exercise of high-frequency buying and selling funds additionally offers a Markets carry liquidity – higher liquidity ought to result in extra environment friendly asset pricing.”
The contentious nature of such restrictions was on full show in South Korea, the place a short-selling ban harm its efforts to win a score from MSCI. The difficulties and challenges confronted by monetary markets will solely develop with the adoption of synthetic intelligence.

The restrictions, normally launched when inventory markets are below stress, have succeeded in stemming the bleeding, however their long-term impression stays controversial given the expansion of computer-assisted buying and selling.
Quantitative methods are primarily based on knowledge science and programs strategies, with some methods using large knowledge to time the market, observe developments, or execute arbitrage trades.
China’s crackdown on quant buying and selling got here in February, when the inventory market was at multi-year lows. The inventory worth rebounded on the again of state fund purchases, however has began to fall once more since late Could.
Thailand’s SET index has fallen about 8% this 12 months, making it one of many worst-performing nationwide benchmarks within the area. The trade stated it can require high-frequency merchants to register earlier than they will place orders. The measures are a part of a bundle of guidelines aimed toward reviving issues concerning the impression of unlawful quick promoting, program buying and selling and company scandals.
Hebe Chen, analyst at IG Markets Ltd, stated: “Policymakers in these markets could view volatility as the primary motive for underperformance. In smaller markets equivalent to Malaysia, the mixture of efficiency and volatility is extra according to China and South Korea. Similarity, due to this fact, can not rule out the potential for establishing one’s personal security internet.
Chan added that nations with nearer ties to world traders, equivalent to Japan and Singapore, are unlikely to impose such restrictions as they search to be according to “basic guidelines of the sport”.

With restrictions now wanting set to stay in place, market observers have warned of a chilling impression on commerce exercise and a possible blow to the federal government’s repute.
In response to CITIC Securities estimates, the asset measurement of China’s quantitative hedge funds fell within the first quarter for the primary time because the finish of 2022.
In South Korea, quant funds are wanting elsewhere as the federal government extends a short-selling ban till the tip of March 2025.
“As a result of they can’t undertake varied methods in South Korea, they’re bidding farewell to the Korean market and turning to arbitrage buying and selling in Japan and Hong Kong,” stated Jung In Yun, CEO of Fibonacci Asset Administration International Pte.
To make sure, some folks welcome these restrictions as a result of they cut back short-term speculative buying and selling. George Molina, head of buying and selling at Templeton International Investments, stated the principles “have to be adjusted for attainable loopholes within the system.”
Li Wei, portfolio supervisor of multi-asset quantitative options at BNP Paribas Asset Administration, echoed this view, saying that such measures assist create a extra steady and clear market setting and in the end profit all contributors.
The governments of developed nations equivalent to america and Europe have additionally adopted short-term restrictive measures during times of economic stress, such because the ban on quick promoting of economic shares in america in 2008 and varied restrictive measures through the outbreak of the epidemic.
Charu Chanana, a strategist at Saxo Markets, stated the “final impression” would rely upon how regulation balances the necessity to shield traders with out stifling market effectivity and innovation. “Synthetic intelligence can result in extra algorithmic buying and selling, however this type of buying and selling remains to be liable to sudden and excessive market fluctuations. Regulators in Asia could also be sluggish to reply to the event of synthetic intelligence, so preventive measures could also be extra stringent.