Grammy-nominated songwriter Jon Hume universal music group Dispute with Common Music Australia over audio stems utilized in Dean Lewis hits All is effectively.
The lawsuit was filed in a Tennessee courtroom on Wednesday (June 19) by the Australian-born Hume, who now lives in Nashville.
Hume has collaborated with artists reminiscent of Dean Lewis (all is effectively, half a person and how do i say goodbye), in addition to Sofi Tukker, Bebe Rexha, JP Cooper, NEEDTOBREATHE and Calum Scott.
Launched in 2018, the whole lot is ok has flowed 1.7 billion Second-rate Spotify Alone.
Hume mentioned within the lawsuit that he and UMG/UMG Australian artist Lewis created the Every thing is ok”Round September 2015.”
He added that once they had been writing and recording the demo for the tune, Hume created numerous tracks, the “spine” on which he performed every instrument used within the demo.
Hume claims he “additionally acted as a producer and created the unique recordings utilizing his music” Every thing is ok.”
The lawsuit additional claims: “Hulme alone made the unique recording and performed and recorded all devices contained therein, besides Dean Lewis’s voice.
“Every of those devices was recorded on a separate stem, and when mixed collectively, they make up the whole sound embodied within the authentic recording, aside from Dean Lewis’ vocal observe.”
Hume claimed in his lawsuit that you might Read the full article here, Later in 2016, then UMG Australia managing director Michael Taylor requested by way of electronic mail in July 2016 that “Hume ship the stems to a different producer”.
In the identical electronic mail to Hume and his spouse and supervisor, Karen Hume, Taylor informed the Humes that “to save lots of money and time,” Stems was writing the whole lot is ok “For ‘reference’ solely and’ don’t use the Stems within the demo [a reference to the Original Recording] Will enter the Grasp.
Hume claimed that Michael Taylor despatched him an electronic mail the subsequent month asking if UMG might “primarily” use the unique Stems, and that the e-mail “ended with a ‘smiley’ image.”
In line with the lawsuit, UMG Australia and Hume then mentioned giving Hume producer credit score the whole lot is ok Because of the meant use of audio stems. On Spotify, he’s at present credited because the observe’s songwriter.
However Hume mentioned within the criticism that on Could 1, 2018, former UMG Australia managing director Michael Taylor “purposefully made suggestions to Humes” on behalf of the corporate, and UMG Australia in the end didn’t use any of the data within the writing course of. Stems, in any case, had Dean Lewis concerned within the ultimate grasp recording.
The lawsuit then claims that in December 2023, Dean Lewis offered Jon Hume with “the whole stem set containing the launched masters.” [of Be Alright] As a reference for one more tune the place Dean Lewis was searching for the providers of Jon Hume”.
He claims that when he obtained the stems, he “found that opposite to UMG’s representations, greater than fifty p.c (50%) of the stems current within the authentic recordings had been additionally current within the launched grasp tapes.”
“Opposite to UMG’s claims, greater than fifty p.c (50%) of the STEMS embodied within the authentic recordings are additionally represented within the launched grasp tapes.”
Lawsuit filed by Jon Hume
Hume is suing UMG and UMG Australia for copyright infringement, alleging they “misappropriated the sounds embodied on Stems and that they “hid and misrepresented [Hume] They did not use the stems”.
Hume’s criticism additionally alleges that Common Music Group “has claimed and registered copyright within the recordings of the launched masters, which embody [Hume’s] It sounds” and “Defendant instantly infringed Plaintiff’s Stems copyright.”
He seeks “statutory damages, compensatory damages, cheap attorneys’ charges and associated prices.” [UMG] direct infringement.”
He additionally seeks “an accounting of all ‘earnings’ as outlined in 17 U.S.C. § 504, attributable to the infringements obtained by UMG.”
As well as, Hume additionally requested that “as a substitute for his copyright infringement declare” he wished the courtroom to subject “an announcement” stating that “he’s a joint creator of the revealed grasp and a professional copyright claimant.”
He claimed that there was a “substantial dispute” between him and the defendant “as as to if [Hume] Whether or not you’re the creator of the “launched grasp” recording. The lawsuit continues: “The courtroom’s declaration will put an finish to the dispute between plaintiff and defendant.”
Hume’s lawsuit additionally claims that he’s “entitled to an accounting of any and all earnings derived instantly or not directly from Defendants’ exploitation of the launched masters and to cost of Plaintiff’s share of such earnings”.
The criticism continues: “Defendants are obligated to account for earnings derived, derived or generated from the usage of launched masters, together with, however not restricted to, beneath licenses, sublicenses, leases and/or launch grasp orders formally or informally issued by defendants. switch of rights.
international music enterprise
