Jake Paul’s promotions firm says hypothesis that his unanimous resolution victory over Mike Tyson was rigged is “incorrect and baseless”.
The YouTuber-turned-boxer defeated the 58-year-old former undisputed world heavyweight champion in eight two-minute rounds within the controversial battle on November 15. 80-72, 79-73 and 79-73 in favor of the 27-year-old.
Paul’s Most Helpful Promotions, which companions with Netflix to host the most-watched world sporting occasion in historical past, insisted in a press release launched on Monday that it complied with all necessities for a contest accepted by the Texas Division of Licensing and Rules Correct provision.
“Each fighters genuinely carried out to the most effective of their talents with the purpose of profitable the battle,” MVP’s assertion mentioned.
“There are completely no restrictions on any boxer – contractual or in any other case. Each boxer is ready to use his full arsenal to win. Any settlement on the contrary could be a violation of the TDLR Boxing Guidelines.
Nonetheless, large names within the sport have questioned the sport’s authenticity, together with Corridor of Famer Oscar de la Hoya, who posted on social media, “Everyone seems to be Discuss how this recreation performed out.
“I do imagine it was scripted and I imagine Tyson was positively stopped. Look, I am a fighter and I can see that.
“It was on their information and sanctioned. Jake Paul paid to have W on his information! For what? To your private gratification?
“I inform you on a regular basis, if you wish to be an actual warrior, as you name your self, what are you doing? Who’s subsequent? Joe Biden? You need to battle actual warriors.”
Paul himself fueled a number of the rumors when he was requested throughout the postgame press convention if he had stopped within the third spherical.
“Sure, in fact. Completely a little bit bit,” he advised reporters. “I need to give the followers a present, however I do not need to damage individuals who do not have to be damage.”
MVP mentioned it was “illogical and silly” to recommend the corporate was breaking the foundations and risking a brand new, probably profitable partnership with Netflix.
The assertion added: “Trash speaking and hypothesis are frequent in sport, and athletes and promoters must tolerate nonsense feedback, jokes and opinions. However to recommend that these fighters are usually not giving their all is just not solely naive, but in addition disrespectful of their dedication. An insult to effort.