Two prime Republicans operating for Senate majority management talked about how they’d block Kamala Harris’ agenda, together with a possible Supreme Courtroom nominee, in the event that they win the Senate within the upcoming election.
South Dakota Sen. John Thune informed CNN’s Manu Raju that if Kamala Harris wins the presidency and Republicans take the Senate seats, then no abortion proposal would get 60 votes within the Senate.
Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, individually informed Raju that he wouldn’t “schedule a vote on some ardent radical candidate that I do know she would like to nominate.”
watch:
New: "I am not going to schedule a vote for some rabidly radical candidate I do know she’d like to nominate." @mkrajuNew report on proceed @SenJohnThune and @John Corning might create obstacles for a possible Harris presidency. https://t.co/5RHjVGkE12 #politicalinside pic.twitter.com/nIAPOb9IbR
— Inside Politics (@InsidePolitics) September 29, 2024
Raju asks: Will you intend a nationwide abortion ban to the bulk chief?
Thune responded that “no” abortion invoice might get 60 votes: I do not assume any abortion invoice might get 60 votes within the U.S. Congress.
Raju: Would you agree with Harris’ affirmation to the Supreme Courtroom?
Thune: Nicely, I imply, clearly relying on who it’s, that is the benefit of a Republican Senate.
Thune stated he wouldn’t change the filibuster on any problem.
One other potential majority chief, Texas Sen. John Cornyn, has additionally stated he does not assume an abortion ban will get 60 votes and that he would completely maintain the filibuster in place.
When requested by Raju if he would permit affirmation of Harris’ Supreme Courtroom nominee, Sen. Cornyn stated, “I believe that additionally is determined by who the president nominates” and that he wouldn’t “schedule a vote on sure individuals.” Loopy radical candidate that I do know she would like to nominate.
Harris, a former prosecutor and lawyer common, has the help of dozens of former Republican officers and ex-officials. trump card
So the concept that she would nominate a “loopy radical” to the Supreme Courtroom is laughable. Cornyn’s feedback could also be finest translated into the phrases of peculiar voters, as he will not schedule a vote for somebody who protects fundamental private freedoms like abortion and well being care. Unusually, Republican management views fundamental freedoms as radical however long-established freedoms as conservative (which isn’t conventional conservatism).
Thune has been on the talking circuit for Republican Senate candidates.
Since 2009, Republicans have labored to stymie the election of a Democratic president to the purpose of pushing the nation to a fiscal cliff and shut down the federal government after they didn’t implement components of their radical agenda.
Within the Senate, they used that energy to disclaim a vote on then-President Obama’s Supreme Courtroom nominee Merrick Garland, who was revered by each events. Garland would have made the proper Supreme Courtroom justice; he had a average temperament and a dedication to the rule of regulation and precedent, in contrast to the three justices Donald Trump placed on the court docket and definitely in full opposition to conservative Justice Clarence Thomas’ rampant corruption.
So on this context, the best way Cornyn and Thune responded to the difficulty of abortion bans was to increase its scope to any abortion measure, which was a technique to escape being held accountable by their supporters for not committing to passing an abortion ban. .
Most Individuals need protections restored for Roe. Due to Republican abortion bans, girls are dying and others are dropping their fertility and experiencing pointless worry and ache akin to medical torture. Republicans have pledged to proceed permitting girls and women to die beneath their rule in the event that they win the Senate. It’s value pausing right here to ask ourselves how they outline “pro-life” and why this definition excludes the lives of girls and women.
Republicans’ pledge to proceed abusing their energy to thwart the desire of the individuals is an assault on the foundations of freedom and democracy on which our nation rests. They’ve grow to be a radical get together, the commonsense Republican Social gathering has been marginalized, and excessive voices have been amplified, which is straight contradictory to the present Democratic Social gathering.
